Alan Keyes, as seen by Luther R. Dawson

Yo, this is Luther. Luther R. Dawson. You don’t need to know who I am, but Bomani said I could post today, so long as I let you know his column last week was on Nelly, and this week will be on Eminem.
We went to see Alan Keyes speak yesterday, and Baba says he’s too tired to post, so he’s leaving it to me. So where Bomani has to be decent so he doesn’t say anything to mess up his career, I ain’t got shit to lose but about thirty pounds.

So we strolled into the rotunda of Carolina’s law school to see Keyes speak. First thing we noticed was the room was filled with white folks. To the gills, man. Here and there we saw some black folks, so I instantly start trying to figure out what side of the fence the Negroes were on. I’m sure some of them came to hear their leaders speak, but maybe of them were there like me and Bo…to see if buddy would rattle off an old spiritual.
See, your man Alan sang a spiritual on Meet the Press or Face the Nation when he was getting mollywopped by Obama. Seems Al didn’t think Obama was black enough, so he decided to sing a spiritual. And, the dude asked the people on the show to sing with him. You know the white folks declined. Obama looked at him like he just fell of the turnip truck.
For his next trick, we figured Keyes would engage Barack in a watermelon seed spittin’ contest. Hasn’t happened yet, but my money’s on Alan.
That’s because buddy can spit that shit.
Your man’s a helluva speaker. His words were chosen just right, his tone of voice was powerful, and my man is sharp as hell. I can say what I want about the cat, but he was definitely the smartest man in the room (Bomani might disagree with that, but that’s why I’m writing this week…gotta humble that cat).
Since this talk was at the law school, your man Keyes discussed how federalism is being ignored by the judicial branch. Sound boring? Well, it was. Not much room for Alan to tap dance with that topic. He did rattle off some silly stuff, though. His big point is that the federal government has no standing to make any laws concerning religion, meaning that states are given the right to do what they want concerning religion, according to the tenth amendment. As you might expect, Alan’s blaming things on those damn “activist judges,” those who choose to use interpretations of the law that aren’t stiff and literal.
And in terms of words, ol’ Alan had a point. However, let’s peep this logic…
Since those slaveholders that wrote the Constitition feared government using religion like tyrants, they made it so the big federal structure had no say-so on it. So, Keyes will have one believe the intention was to give all that power to the states. So, what Madison and the boys really wanted to allow was for the states to impose religion on the lives of others! Yeah, that makes a lot of damn sense, Alan. A lot.
Please. That was his major point, but buddy’s game is sharp. He double talked so well and played those words like a harmonica.
But here’s the big one about Al…Al’s one of those that says that Americans make laws based on moral fiber, and that moral fiber should be put back into the law. Americans are down with that shit in Iraq because they feel it’s a moral war.
Buddy never quite said what moral was. Apparently, he sees himself as the man that decides what moral is. If heading over there to kill those folks is considered moral, I’ll take stiff drinks, wild women, and an aversion to murder on my route to the promised land.
And I bet I’ll get there first. Hungover, maybe, but first.
The thing about cats like him is that they assume that their view of morality is the standard. I ain’t know that power came with his Ph.D from Harvard. Maybe Bo shoulda applied there. He’d have so much more authority if he could do that.
It’s that morality bullshit that keeps me ready to climb the walls. See, Keyes himself explained the internal conflicts in the Middle East as examples of the evil people do in the name of self-righteousness. Then, the dude rattled off–for what seemed like an eternity–just how self-righteous he really is.
So what evil does he do?
Alan didn’t have much to say on that one. Young Baba was too frustrated to ask him a question, and Bo sure as hell wasn’t gonna let me get on the mic. I’d get us both locked up if they let me talk.
But Alan didn’t coon, and I’m hot about that. I went to see him talk that smack that’s made him famous, and he left it alone. So instead of having lots of things to clown, me and Bo were left struck by his intelligence, but then we realized he simply uses it for evil. That’s so all bad, shawty.
He’s frustrating dealing with him the same way it’s hard to listen to that McWhorter cat at Berkeley. Both are sharp, man…too sharp to really believe half the stuff they say. Both are terribly condescending, making me think they ain’t go to school with people that fought.
They are what they are. Just on the side of evil, man. That dark side. Wanna know how to get there? Turn right.
But that’s what it was. Wish it was more, but it ain’t. Maybe he’ll run for some office and belt a few bars of “Wade in the Water.” That’s what I wanted to hear.
And he ain’t even give me that. Bad logic and a boring topic? What a buster. I wanted to hit him with that Kurt Cobain…”here we are now, entertain us!”
Couldn’t even get that. I’m bout as disappointed as when that girl made Bo go see Catwoman. At least he ain’t have to pay for this, though (he ain’t pay for that one either, but he don’t like seein’ no one waste money).
****
Holla back on Friday, Bo told me to tell you. He got a lot to say about that new Eminem.

4 Comments

  • Posted November 11, 2004 3:31 pm 0Likes
    by G. Price

    Dawson:
    I find your comments on Alan Keye’s case for morality to be on..but absurd nonethless.
    You see, the problem, as I see it, for Modern Man, and in my case—the Modern Negro, is to take modernity seriously. The champion of the modern sensibility, and it’s imperatives is none other than Fredrich Nieztche, who lays our our burden in two cases:
    “There are no Moral Phenomena..only Moral interpretation of Phenomena”
    And last but not least:
    “If by the Death of God we don’t fashion a major renunciation of ourselves—-we will have to pay for that loss”
    Question, can the Modern Man/Negro Dig this? I am perfectly willing/able to live in a world without God and Morality. Clearly, we humans can fashion some equilibrium coordinating device, that may even resemble the historical God and conventional morality to achieve our narrow empirical goals (Admission to top law schools for example—tonque-in-cheek).
    Peace,
    –G.Price

  • Posted November 12, 2004 11:57 am 0Likes
    by Barbara A.P. Jones

    What a wonderful guest columnist–insightful, provocative and clever. Luther has all the makings of a good Baptist preacher. He gave homage in the beginning the middle and the end to the home pastor and then went on to do his own thing. He honored the home columnist by showing that it was a good decision to have chosen an able writer. Good team.

  • Posted November 14, 2004 2:00 am 0Likes
    by H-Town Homie

    Man, that Luther cat has been wrecking shit ever since he showed up on the scene…I loved meeting him when he was visiting the H! Glad to see he’s as articulate as he is entertaining. Meanwhile, the comment from BAP Jones made him that much more legit. Here’s to yet another blossoming career in writing…and another reason for women of all ages to fall for a man named Luther.

  • Posted November 15, 2004 1:34 pm 0Likes
    by Elizabeth

    I really enjoyed reading this. Like the style. I see why you guys are friends. Who ever thought reading about Alan Keyes could be interesting? Nice use of “buddy”

Leave a comment

The Email
Jones

Mailing List

Become a subscriber of our online community and receive occasional news straight to your inbox! Thanks for your support.